MA2051 - Ordinary Differential Equations
Project 2a - Nonlinear Shocks - C97




You have seen in lecture and exercises how to model a spring-mass system with damping and external forcing. One application for the model is an automobile suspension system, where the forcing term is the road (with or without frost heaves) and shock absorbers provide the damping.

In this project, you will study the behavior of the solution with different types of damping terms. Recognize that once you allow the damping coefficient to depend on the solution, the equation is no longer linear and most analytic solution methods (such as characteristic equations and undetermined coefficients) are useless. You have no choice but to study the system through numerical methods.

  1. To start, describe the limiting behavior of the standard model

    displaymath21

    One of the best ways to picture the solution curves for this model is in the (x,v) = (position, velocity) plane. Derive a system of first-order differential equations for x(t) and tex2html_wrap_inline27 and plot solution curves in the (x,v) plane. Pay particular attention to the limiting behavior of the solutions. How does the limit depend on the initial data? How does it depend on other parameters in the model?

  2. Mathematicians and engineers at the Renault Automobile Company have studied a new type of shock absorber which controls the damping coefficient. Their new shock absorber can increase the damping coefficient whenever the mass (i.e., the car) is returning toward equilibrium. In the mathematical model, the damping coefficient is a discontinuous function of both x(t) and v(t).

    Do some numerical experiments with the Renault shock absorber. Explain in detail how you program the damping coefficient in your equation. Take tex2html_wrap_inline35 for the forcing function and describe the limiting behavior of the solution for a range of tex2html_wrap_inline37 values. Does the new shock absorber give a ``smoother'' ride than the original shock absorber? Justify your recommendations.

  3. It is not clear that ``limiting behavior'' is the right way to measure the quality of a shock absorber. Can you come up with other criteria better suited to the real application?

Final Version Due: Thursday, March 6



  

© 1997 by
MA2051 Webmasters All rights Reserved. File last modified on February 27, 1997