The **implicitdiff** command can be used to find derivatives of
implicitly defined functions. Suppose we wanted to use implicit
differentiation to find
for the relation

Then we first define our relation and give it a label for later use.

> f:=x^2*y^2+y^3=0;The syntax of the

> implicitdiff(f,y,x);

The result of the command is the implicit derivative,
. The syntax of this command is very similar to that of
the `diff` command. The first argument is always the relation
that you want to differentiate implicitly. We were careful to use an
equation for this argument, but if you just give an expression for
this argument, Maple assumes you want to set this expression equal to
zero before differentiating. The second argument to the
`implicitdiff` command is where you tell Maple what the
dependent variable is. That is, by putting `y` here, we were
saying that we were thinking of this relation as defining and
not . The remaining arguments to `implicitdiff` are for
specifying the order of the derivative you want.

Second derivatives can also be computed with **implicitdiff**. The
following command computes
.

> implicitdiff(f,y,x,x);

To compute numerical values of derivatives obtained by implicit differentiation, you have to use the subs command. For example, to find the value of at the point you could use the following command.

> subs({x=1,y=-1},implicitdiff(f,y,x));

Suppose you wanted to find the equation of the tangent line to the graph of at the point . You may want to label the output to at the point as for slope and then you can use the point-slope form of a line to get the equation of the tangent line. The Maple commands below show how this can be done.

> m:=subs({x=1,y=-1},implicitdiff(f,y,x)); > tanline := y-(-1)=m*(x-1); > implicitplot({f,tanline},x=0..2,y=-2..0);

Now suppose, using the same relation , you want to find the location of horizontal tangents. The implicit derivative involves both variables and , so you would need to solve for them simultaneously. When solving for two variables, two equations are needed. The two equations would be where the derivative is zero and the original relation. You would need to have a rough estimate as to where the horizontal tangents occur so that you can use `fsolve` in a range of and values. Maple will give you an and a solution, but a horizontal line is of the form , so only the solution is needed. This can be done in Maple as follows:

> der:=implicitdiff(f,y,x); > a:=fsolve({f,der=0},{x=-1..1,y=-1..1}); > implicitplot({f,y=a[2]},x=-1..1,y=-1..1);

Sometimes you want the value of a derivative, but first have to find
the coordinates of the point. More than likely, you will have to use
the `fsolve` command for this. However, to get the
`fsolve` command to give you the solution you want, you often
have to specify a range for the variable. Being able to plot the graph
of a relation can be a big help in this task, so we now describe the
`implicitplot` command.
This Maple command for plotting implicitly defined functions
is in the `plots` package which must be loaded before using the
command.

> with(plots):Here is an example of using this command to plot the hyperbola . Note that you have to specify both an range and a range. This is because the

> implicitplot(x^2-y^2=1,x=-3..3,y=-3..3);To get a good graph with this command, you usually have to experiment with the ranges. For example the following command

> implicitplot(f,x=-1..1,y=1..2);produces an empty plot. The reason is simply that there are no solutions to with . This is easy to see if you rewrite the equation as and recognize that both sides of the equation must be nonnegative. Usually a good strategy to follow is to start with fairly large ranges, for example to for both variables, and then refine them based on what you see.

This command can also have problems if the relation in question has solution branches that cross or are too close together. For example, try the following command.

> implicitplot(f,x=-1..1,y=-1..0);For less than about , you should see the two smooth curves. However, for values of closer to zero the two curves become jagged. To understand this, we need to take a closer look at the relation we tried to plot. The key is to notice that we can factor out and write our relation as follows.

This makes it clear that the graph of the relation really has two pieces: and . These two curves intersect at the origin, which explains why

As our last example, consider the relation . Try the following commands to see what a part of the graph of this relation looks like.

> g := x^2*sin(y)=1; > implicitplot(g,x=-4..4,y=-10..10);Suppose you were asked to find the slope of the graph of this relation at , but you were only given that the value of was about 9. Using the plot, it is relatively easy to find this derivative by first using

> y_sol := fsolve(subs(x=2,g),y=8..10); > evalf(subs({x=2,y=y_sol},implicitdiff(g,y,x)));

- Plot the graph of the relation
over the interval
and
. Find all values when . Find the slope of the relation when and is positive.
- Given the relation
,
- Plot the graph of the relation over the interval and . Find the values when ?
- Find the slope of the graph at all points where and label each slope a different variable name (ie. , ,...)
- Find the equation of all lines tangent to the graph at . Be sure to label each tangent line as an implicit relation using the point-slope form of a line. Supply a plot of the relation and the tangent lines over the interval and .

- For the ellipse , find the location of all horizontal tangent lines and plot them implicitly on the same graph as the relation over the interval and . (Hint: Remember that a horizontal line is of the form , where is some constant value.)

2010-09-23