Next: About this document ...
Up: lab_template
Previous: lab_template
Subsections
The simple model for growth is
exponential growth, where
it is assumed that
is proportional to
. That is,
Separating the variables and integrating, we have
so that
In the case of exponential growth, we can drop the absolute value
signs around
, because
will always be a positive quantity.
Solving for
, we obtain
which we may write in the form
, where
is an
arbitrary positive constant. The same formula is used for exponential decay, except the decay constant
is negative.
What is usually called Newton's law of cooling is a simple model for
the change in temperature of an object that is in contact with an
environment at a different temperature. It says that the rate of
change of the temperature of an object is proportional to the
difference between the object's temperature and the temperature of the
environment. Mathematically, this can be expressed as the differential
equation
where
is the constant of proportionality and
is
the temperature of the environment. Using a technique called
separation of variables it isn't hard to derive the solution
where
is the temperature of the object at
.
Consider the functions
defined by
To be able to get an inverse the function must be one-to-one. You can plot the
functions to get a hint as to whether they are invertible or not.
> f:=x->exp(x)+exp(-x);
> plot(f(x),x=-5..5);
> g:=x->exp(x)-exp(-x);
> plot(g(x),x=-5..5);
Both satisfy the vertical-line test but
is not invertible since it does
not satisfy the horizontal-line test. Indeed
is not one-to-one, for instance
. From the plot it seems that the function
is one-to-one.
In order to determine its inverse we solve for x.
> solve(g(x)=y,x);
We observe that one of the solutions is not defined since the arguement of the logarithm can only be positive. Thus:
> ginv:=y->ln(y/2+sqrt(y^2+4)/2);
Let's look at the plot along with the line
to see if our functions seem to make sense.
> plot({x,g(x),ginv(x)},x=-20..20,y=-20..20,scaling=constrained);
Let's check that we have computed the right inverse. By definition the composot
ion of the functions should be the line
since an inverse is the reflectio
n about this line.
> g(ginv(y));
> simplify(%);
> ginv(g(x));
> simplify(%);
We are having difficulty getting
for the last composition. Think about what
issue the computer has in dealing with this simplification as you will come across this in the exercises.
- A certain radioactive substance has a half-life of 35 years. How much of a 500 kg substance will remain after 12 years? How many years will it take for 80% of the original amount has decomposed?
- Suppose an object that is
is placed in a room that is
and the temperature of the object drops
in 1 hour. What will the temperature of the object be after 3 hours?
- Given the functions
and
(Hint: Use Maple's surd function when entering fractional exponents.)
- A)
- Plot the function
over the interval
and plot the function
over the same interval, but on a separate graph. Which function is not invertible and why?
- B)
- Find the inverse of the invertible function.
- C)
- Plot the function and its inverse along with the line
on the domain of
and
.
- D)
- Show that you have the correct inverse by using the composite definition. (When
you come across a simplifying problem and have figured out why the computer won't simplify ask your lab instructor how to bypass this problem.)
Next: About this document ...
Up: lab_template
Previous: lab_template
Dina Solitro
2006-12-06