next up previous
Next: About this document ... Up: No Title Previous: No Title

Subsections


Parametric Curves and Vector-valued Functions in the Plane

Purpose

The purpose of this lab is to introduce you to curve computations using Maple for parametric curves and vector-valued functions in the plane.

Background

By parametric curve in the plane, we mean a pair of equations x=f(t) and y=g(t) for t in some interval I. A vector-valued function in the plane is a function $\mathbf{F}(t)$ that associates a vector in the plane with each value of t in its domain. Such a vector valued function can always be written in component form as follows,

\begin{displaymath}
\mathbf{F}(t) = f(t) \mathbf{i} + g(t) \mathbf{j} \end{displaymath}

where f and g are functions defined on some interval I. From our definition of a parametric curve, it should be clear that you can always associate a parametric curve with a vector-valued function by just considering the curve traced out by the head of the vector. However, there are lots of situations where a vector-valued function is more appropriate. This happens most often when the quantity you want to describe with the function is natural to think of as a vector, for example, a force or a displacement. However, there can be situations when the quantity is not a vector, but it is convenient to think of it as a vector to simplify the notation or the calculations. The idea to keep in your mind is that one of the motivations of vector notation is to simplify and clarify calculations or other manipulations.

Many applications of calculus to engineering or science involve parametric curves or vector valued functions, including the examples listed below.

For the applications we will deal with, we only need to consider curvilinear motion of a point in the plane, That is, we have a vector-valued function $\mathbf{r}(t)$ that gives the position at time t of a moving point P in the plane. The velocity of this point is given by the derivative $\mathbf{r}'(t)$ and the acceleration is given by the second derivative, $\mathbf{r}''(t)$. If the velocity, $\mathbf{r}'(t)$, is not the zero vector, then it is clear from the way it is defined that $\mathbf{r}'(t)$ is a vector that is tangent to the curve at the point $\mathbf{r}(t)$. A simple example of curvilinear motion is when the velocity is constant. That is, there is a fixed vector $\mathbf{v}_0$ such that

\begin{displaymath}
\mathbf{r}'(t) = \mathbf{v}_0 \end{displaymath}

In this case, the motion is along a straight line, with $\mathbf{r}(t)$ given by

\begin{displaymath}
\mathbf{r}(t) = \mathbf{r}_0 + t \mathbf{v}_0 \end{displaymath}

where $\mathbf{r}_0$ is the position at t=0.

In many applications of curvilinear motion, we need to know the magnitude of the velocity, or the speed. This is easy to compute - just take the magnitude $\mid
\mathbf{r}'(t) \mid$. If f and g are the component functions of $\mathbf{r}$, then the speed is given by

\begin{displaymath}
\mid \mathbf{r}'(t) \mid = \sqrt{f'(t)^2+g'(t)^2} \end{displaymath}

Using our idea of the parametric curve associated with $\mathbf{r}(t)$ and recalling the definition of arc length, we arrive at a different interpretation of speed as the rate of change of arc length, or

\begin{displaymath}
\frac{ds}{dt} = \mid \mathbf{r}'(t) \mid \end{displaymath}

where s is arc length. This should make sense, if you recall that speed is the rate of change of distance with time and arc length is distance measured along a curve.

If the speed is not zero for any value of t in the interval I, then it is possible to define a unit vector, $\mathbf{T}(t)$ that is tangent to the curve as follows.

\begin{displaymath}
\mathbf{T}(t) = \frac{\mathbf{r}'(t)}{\mid \mathbf{r}'(t) \mid} \end{displaymath}

Using this definition, you can write the velocity in the following form.

\begin{displaymath}
\mathbf{r}'(t) = \frac{ds}{dt} \mathbf{T}(t) \end{displaymath}

Now, it is natural for the student to ask why one would want to do this. Computing the velocity using the right hand side of the equation above is certainly more difficult than taking the derivative of $\mathbf{r}(t)$, so this equation is not really useful from a computational viewpoint. The answer to this is that the unit tangent vector T at a particular point on the curve is an intrinsic property of the curve, at least up to a sign change. To use an analogy, think of the curve as being a one-way road. Different drivers can drive at different speeds, but at a particular point on the road, each car is pointed in the same direction, i.e. the direction of the unit tangent vector at that point. Now suppose that the road allows traffic in both directions. If you think about it a little, it should be clear that if the tangent vector at a particular point on the road for traffic going one direction is $\mathbf{T}$, then the tangent vector at the same point for traffic going the opposite direction is $-\mathbf{T}$.

Now suppose, to carry our analogy a little further, that you wanted to analyze the acceleration of a car as it traversed the road. On sections where the road is straight, acceleration depends only on whether the car is speeding up or slowing down. In a curve, however, there is an additional acceleration, called the centripetal acceleration, that is needed to keep the car on the road. The magnitude of this acceleration depends on the speed of the car and the sharpness of the curve. It turns out that you can quantify the sharpness of a curve with an intrinsic property of the curve called the curvature, usually denoted $\kappa$, defined by the following equation.

\begin{displaymath}
\kappa = \left\vert \frac{d \mathbf{T}}{ds} \right\vert \end{displaymath}

That is, the curvature is the magnitude of the rate of change of the tangent vector $\mathbf{T}$ with respect to arc length. For example, the curvature of a straight line is zero and it can be shown that the curvature of a circle of radius R is the same for every point on the circle and is given by $\kappa = 1/R$.

If the curvature is never zero for a particular curve, then we can define another intrinsic property of curve, the unit normal vector $\mathbf{N}$ by the following equation.

\begin{displaymath}
\frac{d \mathbf{T}}{ds} = \kappa \mathbf{N} \end{displaymath}

It can be shown that at each point on the curve the vector $\mathbf{N}$ defined by this equation is a unit vector that is always perpendicular to the tangent vector T at that point. Furthermore, the unit normal vector $\mathbf{N}$ always points in the direction of the centripetal acceleration required to keep a particle moving on the curve. One way to see this is to compute the acceleration by differentiating both sides of the equation

\begin{displaymath}
\mathbf{r}'(t) = \frac{ds}{dt} \mathbf{T}(t) \end{displaymath}

for the velocity and using the chain rule and the definition of the curvature and the normal vector to obtain the following important equation.

\begin{displaymath}
\mathbf{r}''(t) = \frac{d^2s}{dt^2} \mathbf{T} + \kappa \left
( \frac{ds}{dt} \right)^2 \mathbf{N} \end{displaymath}

To see why this equation is important, recall that ds/dt is the speed, so d2s/dt2 is the rate of change of the speed. In our analogy of a car driving on a road, this term measures whether the car is speeding up or slowing down. Because this component of the acceleration is in the direction of the tangent vector it is often called the tangential acceleration, denoted with the symbol aT. The component of the acceleration in the direction of the normal vector is called the normal acceleration, denoted aN.

Computing these intrinsic properties of a curve is generally not an easy task. The Getting started worksheet for this lab describes commands from the CalcP package that simplify these calculations and provides examples for you to work from.

Exercises

1.
Suppose that at time zero, flight 12 is at the point (-100 mi,-100 mi) at an altitude of 30,000 feet and traveling Northeast at 420 mph and that flight 33 is at the same altitude, but is traveling due west at a speed of 388 mph. At time zero, flight 33 is at the point (200 mi, 30 mi).
(a)
What is the minimum distance between flights 12 and 33, and at what time does it occur?
(b)
Suppose that FAA regulations require that the closest approach of any two aircraft must not be less than 2000 feet. Can you change the speed of flight 33 so that this regulation is satisfied? What is your new speed, and what is the closest approach distance?
(Hint - set up parametric descriptions of the positions of the two flights and use the distance formula. Make sure that you explain each step of your procedure.)
2.
Consider the curve in the plane given by y=x2 for $-2 \leq x
\leq 2$ and the two different parametrizations given below. In each case t is restricted to the interval $-2 \leq t \leq 2$.
(a)
$\mathbf{r}_1(t) = t \mathbf{i} + t^2 \mathbf{j}$
(b)
$\mathbf{r}_1(t) = -t \mathbf{i} + t^2 \mathbf{j}$
(a)
Describe the difference between these two different parametrizations.
(b)
Compute the unit tangent vector $\mathbf{T}$ at the point x=0, y=0 for each parametrization and explain your results.
(c)
Compute the curvature and the unit normal vector at the point x=0, y=0 for each parametrization and explain your results.

3.
A hairpin turn on a roadway can be approximated as half of an ellipse, including the half of major (longer) axis. If the major axis is 100 feet and the minor axis is 80 feet, what is the maximum (constant) speed a car can go through the turn while keeping the centripetal acceleration less than 0.3g, where g is the acceleration due to gravity?

4.
Consider ${\bf r}(t) = t{\bf i} + (t^3-t){\bf j}$. What is the normal vector at t=0.01? At t=-0.01? What about at t=0? What goes wrong?

5.
For ${\bf r}(t) = t{\bf i} + t^2{\bf j}$ with $-4 \leq t \leq
4$, answer the following questions.
(a)
For which value of t is the speed a maximum?
(b)
For which value of t is the curvature a maximum?
(c)
For which value of t is the tangential acceleration a maximum?
(d)
For which value of t is the normal acceleration a maximum?

next up previous
Next: About this document ... Up: No Title Previous: No Title

William W. Farr
3/23/1999