|
![]() |
Maxima and Minima of Functions
Purpose
Background/Examples A crucial first step in solving such problems is being able to find and classify local extreme points of a function. What we mean by the term local extreme values is contained in the following definition.
In single-variable calculus, we found that the first derivative vanished at a local extreme value. For functions of two variables, both first-order partial derivatives vanish as described by the following theorem.
Notice that having both first order partial derivatives vanish means that the tangent plane is horizontal. Following the terminology we used for functions of a single variable, we call points where the partial derivatives fx and fy vanish critical points. Note carefully that the theorem does not say that a point where the partial derivatives vanish must be a local extreme point. Rather, it says that critical points are candidates for local extrema. Just as was the case for functions of a single variable, there can be critical points that are not extrema. For example, the saddle surface
Finding and classifying the local extreme values of a function
To compute partial derivatives in Maple, it is probably simplest to use the diff command. It is possible to use the D command for partial derivatives, but it is more complicated. The following examples show how to compute (in order) the partial derivatives fx, fy, fxx, fxy, and fyy of the function
> f := (x,y) -> exp(-x^2)*cos(y);
> diff(f(x,y),x); ![]() > diff(f(x,y),y); ![]() > diff(f(x,y),x,x); ![]() > diff(f(x,y),x,y); ![]() > diff(f(x,y),y,y); ![]() Finding critical points can often be accomplished by using the solve command, as shown below.
> solve({diff(f(x,y),x) = 0, diff(f(x,y),y) = 0}, {x,y});
Notice that you have to give the solve command the set of equations to be solved and the set of variables to be solved for and that both sets have to be enclosed in curly braces.
The solve command doesn't always do the job. For example, it only reported one critical point above. It turns out, however, that the function has an infinite number of critical points of the form The solve command attempts to solve equations analytically. Unfortunately, there are some equations that just can't be solved analytically. When Maple can't solve a set of equations analytically, it gives no output from the solve commands. If the solve command doesn't give the results you desire, there are alternatives. One possibility is to try to solve one of the equations for one of the variables in terms of the other, and then substitute into the other equation. This can work very well if it is easy to solve for one of the variables. Another, more general method is to solve the equations numerically using the fsolve command. The main drawbacks are that the fsolve command only finds one solution at a time and that you usually have to have an idea of where the solution is. For example, if you attempt to use the fsolve command on our example without specifying where to look for the solution, Maple can't solve the equation, as shown below.
> fsolve({diff(f(x,y),x) = 0, diff(f(x,y),y) = 0}, {x,y});
On the other hand, we can solve for the critical point at
> fsolve({diff(f(x,y),x) = 0, diff(f(x,y),y) = 0}, {x,y}, {x=-1..1, y=3.5..7});
Locating (if you have to use fsolve) and classifying critical points is probably best done with the plot3d command. By changing the plot ranges and using contours, you should be able to do this fairly easily.
Exercises
|
![]() |